STRENGTH |
LIMITATIONS |
OPPORTUNITY |
RISKS |
Better Milk yield compared to available Indicus cattle breed. | Poor tolerance to summer heat & post summer high Humidity- Air Temp. situations | CB scope lies for farming where the quality of vet. Service good & assured. |
A. Fiscal set back due to:-
1. Low feed efficiency. 2. High Morbidity% 3. High Mortality% 4. Poor milk price. B. Warrants Frequent restocking due to:-
1.High Calf mortality% 2. Heifer production costly
C. Unworthy stock Incurable diseases like mastitis compels culling of high yielders.
Treated Animals act as carriers & pose permanent threat to herd in making them disease prone. |
CB more docile than Indicus | Poor disease resistance i.e. To Mastitis, Theileriosis and Tryps, FMD, & Foot rot. | CB farms suitable when used for training and motivation. | |
Jersy better Prolific than Indicus | Incidence of Milk fever as to zero in Indicus cattle. | Can be used in NGO & Govt. program for restocking, as a part of rehab-activities of temporary nature. | |
Has Govt. policy priority. | High incidence of breeding problems & failures. | ||
Less incidence of hard milker cows | Less versatile to food shortage & inferior quality. | ||
Male calves less worth. | |||
High calf mortality | |||
Low reproductive life span. | |||
Hard to maintain blood level of GoO policy specified level. | |||
Less incidence of Short lactations and lactation failures. | Can’t reach Full blood or rear Pure cattle | ||
Low feed efficiency. | |||
Less rearing cost for female calves due to Shorter maturity leading to Younger age at first calving, | Consumer reluctance to A-1 milk | ||
Less Fat % | |||
Slow herd growth |
Note: Study took farming with Jersey/Holstein mixed compared to Indian milch breed cattle.
Recommendations:-
- Holstein and Jersey donor be withdrawn.
- Let a trial be made using proven donors of Bos.indicus.
- Poor, little aware dairy farmers be sensitized on the issues
- Cattle breeding policy be suitably amended
- Model DPRs be formulated for ease of understanding.